Why Won’t They Return My Call?

I’m sure you’ll recognize the following scenario.  A customer chooses a new company to do business with and begins receiving service(s) from them. They forge a relationship. Promises are made. Maybe the first time or two or three, they are satisfied with the results. Time passes. They come back once more with a question, a special need, a complex task in need of expert advice. They call the salesperson or the project manager. And wait. No reply. What went wrong? Was it something they said? Why the cold shoulder? Is there anybody out there?

There are many reasons why customer service response times can fail or slow down. Drastic changes to company internals can affect communications with customers. Maybe events such as downsizing, mergers, or acquisitions have led to staff reallocations, conflicting roles, or overburdening of existing staff. Maybe sudden expansion has caused confusion, reassignments, and before you know it, customer service contacts start slipping through the cracks.

Another possible reason relates to changing habits in the way people communicate. Millennial generation workers, for example, have a reputation for being averse to phone contact. It’s not their preferred means of staying in touch. Compounding the issue is the fact that there are many more “ways” to communicate these days, whether it be mobile, social media, email, or traditional landline. If a company doesn’t have a coherent strategy for managing and allocating incoming calls to response teams (no matter what channel they come from), it is likely that lapses will occur and frustrations will mount.

The impact of all this can be devastating. Clients obviously will not feel respected, valued, and their immediate needs won’t be addressed, which is incredibly aggravating. And providers who cut corners, treating customer service as an afterthought, will be sorely bruised by negative feedback. The impacts can be crushing. A Zendesk customer lifetime value report found that 66% of B2B customers stopped buying after a bad customer service experience. Bad news travels fast and widely, too: 95% of bad experiences were shared with others, 54% were shared with more than five people, and 45% share bad customer service experiences over social media. Generally, bad news is shared more often than good news.

(Source to link to: https://www.zendesk.com/resources/customer-service-and-lifetime-customer-value/)

It’s a fact that some companies are better at customer experience than others, and it is incumbent on customers to do their homework. Take into account the level of commitment to customer service before opting in, or when considering a switch. Research the track record. Seek out reviews online. Ask around.

What does this mean in practical terms? Fast turnaround times. When a prospective client contacts us, we are in communication with them within a few hours and we constantly monitor incoming messages, whether it be by email or phone. You will hear back. No more calls going into the customer service black hole. We at Marketing Systems Group know our customers deserve better; it’s the kind of courtesy and respect that lives at the heart of our company mission. We are dedicated to customer experience. We don’t think of customers as objects to acquire. Rather, we are in the business of building lasting relationships. Doing that requires effective, fluid, two-way communication and a detail-oriented approach to following up on every lead, issue, and problem that may arise. We respect our customers and don’t forget them. The relationship does not end with making the sale. We enjoy the interaction. It’s how we learn and improve the services we offer. We are facilitators, here to consult, provide options, and keep the focus on your needs.

New Census Data Available for Computer Ownership and Internet Subscription.

The United States Census has long been a treasure trove of data for market researchers, and the riches have just gotten more rewarding. It now offers data regarding computer usage and internet access.

On December 6, 2018, the United States Census Bureau released its Summary File for the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) Five Year Estimates. For the first time this data product contains tables for computer ownership and internet subscription. The ACS assists government, community leaders, and companies in understanding how their communities are undergoing change. It contains a wealth of information on U.S. population and housing. The new Five Year Estimates for computer use are further broken down by estimated characteristics such as household income, age, educational attainment, and labor force status.


To fully appreciate the significance and importance of this release, you have to go back 10 years. In 2008 Congress enacted the Broadband Data Improvement Act, with a goal to identify geographical areas of the country that did not have broadband services. Legislators were hoping to promote deployment of services within underserved areas and in addition, bring affordable services to all areas of the country.

In 2013 the Census started asking questions concerning computer and Internet use in its ongoing American Community Survey (ACS).  Each year the ACS randomly samples approximately 3.5 million addresses, and the information from that survey is released each year in two distinct datasets:

  • One Year Summary File (SF)
  • Five Year Summary File (SF)

The key difference between the datasets is that the Five Year SF is backed by five years of respondents and thus includes estimates down to a very detailed Census Block Group geography. Block Groups are statistical divisions of census tracts that are defined to contain a minimum of 600 people or 240 housing units and a maximum of 3000 people or 1200 housing units. The One Year SF, created from one year of respondents, only includes estimates for large geographies with a population greater than 65,000. Examples of large geographies are census regions and census divisions, individual states, and metropolitan areas (which are groups of cities and surrounding counties).  Incidentally, there are 501 metro areas with populations greater than 65,000.

One Year Summary File Drilldown

Below is an example of the level of detail that can be produced from the One Year SF, looking at Presence of Internet Subscriptions in US Households.

2017 American Community Survey One Year Estimates – Presence of Internet Subscriptions in Households
  United States
Estimate Percentage
Total US Households: 120,062,818
With an Internet subscription 100,662,676 83.84%
Internet access without a subscription 3,395,581 2.83%
No Internet access 16,004,561 13.33%

We see that there are 19,400,142 households (16.16%) in the U.S. that have no Internet subscription or no Internet access, and as the map shows, the highest percentage of no subscription households tend to be concentrated in Appalachia and deep south.

The Five Year Survey

With the 2013-2017 Five Year current release, the ACS has surveyed more than 17.5 million addresses, which is enough to accurately provide estimates down to a detailed level of geography.

However, there is a catch. Unfortunately, just prior to this release the Census announced the removal of the Block Group estimates and it is unclear at this point whether the Block Group estimates will be available before the next release, which is scheduled for December 2019.  This means that currently the lowest level of geography available is Census Tract. A census tract is an area roughly equal to a neighborhood.  Census tracts are smaller than a city, but larger than a block group and generally have a population size between 1,200 and 8,000 people. There are 73,056 Tracts in the US 50 State (+DC) geography.

Below is an example showing how census tract level geography helps to pinpoint particular target households. This analysis can be valuable because it allows users to target specific detailed areas.  In addition, clusters or groups of neighboring areas that have similar characteristics can then be used to define a study area.

New Data Available at Finer Geographic Levels

For the first time, the Five Year summary file offers new tables and categories which are available at detailed geographic levels. Click on the link to find out more information. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/technical-documentation/table-and-geography-changes/2017/5-year.html

One key website containing census and demographic data is the American Fact Finder.  https://factfinder.census.gov.  This site contains an abundance of information but can be tricky to navigate, manipulate, and comprehend.  With over 35 years of combined experience, MSG’s Geo-Demographic team are experts at working with this data and are here for your project needs.

Visit the Resource Center on the MSG website for National estimates of the new data categories.


Explore our geo-demographic capabilities at http://www.m-s-g.com/Pages/genesys/geo_dem_services

Resources and links used in this article:

The ACS 5-Year Estimates. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/technical-documentation/table-and-geography-changes/2017/5-year.html
Broadband Data Improvement Act. https://www.fcc.gov/general/broadband-data-improvement-act
American Community Survey (ACS). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/
Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2013. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2014/acs/acs-28.html
ACS Webinar. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/guidance/training-presentations/acs-5-year.html
American FactFinder. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml